<< Back to CAFA Cases


Title: In re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust

Cite:  2006 WL 1453124 (D. Me. May 25, 2006)

Date:  May 25, 2006

Court: District of Maine (1st Circuit)

Subject: CAFA – Other

Summary: In non-CAFA class action, Maine district court finds CAFA’s notice provisions “persuasive and illuminating,” and orders that notice of settlement be given to attorneys general.

Title: Dinkel v. General Motors Corp.

Cite:  400 F.Supp.2d 289 (D. Me. 2005)

Date: November 9, 2005

Court: District of Maine (1st Circuit)

Subject: CAFA – Burden of Proof, Commencement

Summary:  District Court of Maine denies remand, holds that party seeking remand bears burden of proving an absence of jurisdiction, and that post-removal dismissal of defendants upon whom federal jurisdiction hinged does not entail a remand.

Title: Good v. Altria Group, Inc.

Cite:  231 F.R.D. 446 (D. Me. 2005)

Date: October 28, 2005

Court: District of Maine (1st Circuit)

Subject: CAFA – Other

Summary: In deciding a motion to stay litigation, the District of Maine found that CAFA’s provisions apply to the action, but don’t affect the resolution of the present motion.

About the Site

William_b_rubenstein_2 This site provides attorneys, judges, law professors and students with a comprehensive resource on class action law. The editor is William B. Rubenstein, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Professor Rubenstein's work emphasizes class action law: he has published, litigated, and served as an expert witness in the field and he regularly provides consulting services to attorneys involved in complex procedural matters. More..


June 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30